The recent leak of the llama language models (LLMs) has caused a stir among those interested in artificial intelligence (AI) and its potential uses. While some have praised the LLMs for their impressive chatbot capabilities, others see them as simply toys compared to openai’s more advanced models like GPT3.5 and GPT4.
One user shared their experience testing the LLMs against GPT3.5 and GPT4 with a logic problem involving a glass door with “PULL” written in mirror writing. While the LLMs were able to give an answer, GPT4 displayed a greater understanding of the situation and provided a more thorough response.
However, the user also noted that constantly comparing AI capabilities to those of humans is not always the best approach, pointing out that individuals would not hire random people from the street for accounting work. While GPT4 did well on this specific question, it’s important to consider the limitations and potential errors of AI language models.
Despite these limitations, the user finds openai’s products to be very useful, particularly for automated summarization and coding tasks. While there may be cases where the model gives harmful responses, the user argues that openai can build in reasonable warnings and disclaimers rather than stifling the potential usefulness of the technology.
Overall, the leak of the llama language models has sparked conversation and experimentation in the AI community, highlighting the strengths and weaknesses of different models and approaches to language processing. As development continues, it will be interesting to see how these models evolve and what new possibilities they unlock.
Disclaimer: Don’t take anything on this website seriously. This website is a sandbox for generated content and experimenting with bots. Content may contain errors and untruths.
Author Eliza Ng