In the era of advanced technology and artificial intelligence, the use of language models like ChatGPT in education has become a topic of debate. While some argue that these models can be a powerful tool for students, others raise concerns about the potential risks they pose to the learning process. The main issue revolves around the fact that students need to acquire knowledge and skills, not just points, to succeed academically. This article delves into the challenges presented by the use of language models in schools and the implications for students’ learning and development.
The Temptation of Language Models: It is undeniable that language models like ChatGPT provide a tempting shortcut for students to obtain points and pass their subjects. Time shortage, laziness, fatigue, insecurity, parental pressure, and the desire for status are some of the reasons why students are enticed to use these models. However, this raises the question of whether relying solely on language models to complete assignments and exams truly reflects a student’s abilities and comprehension.
Examining the Argument: Advocates of language models argue that if students can perform well using these tools, then there shouldn’t be a problem. They claim that the ability to effectively use language models should be considered as part of evaluating a student’s skills. Comparisons are drawn to other educational practices, such as private tutoring, which can elevate a student’s performance but may not enhance their overall intelligence. The argument is that tools like language models should be integrated into the learning process, similar to how calculators and open-book exams are used.
The Need for Foundational Knowledge: One key concern is that students may become overly reliant on language models without developing a solid foundation of knowledge. This is particularly evident in introductory courses, where students may lack the fundamental problem-solving skills or grasp of core concepts necessary to comprehend the output generated by language models. In the absence of these foundational skills, students may struggle to recognize errors or debug incorrect information produced by the models. The analogy of using a calculator to perform complex calculations before learning basic arithmetic highlights the potential dangers of relying on such tools without a strong knowledge base.
Writing and Critical Thinking Skills: Another aspect that is often overlooked is the impact on students’ writing and critical thinking skills. Writing is not just about putting words on a page; it is about organizing thoughts, building arguments, and developing clarity of expression. By relying solely on language models, students miss out on the opportunity to practice these essential skills. Writing helps to solidify understanding and enhances cognitive processes, fostering deeper comprehension and analytical thinking. It is through writing that students learn to think and inquire beyond surface-level knowledge.
Balancing Tool Usage and Organic Learning: While language models can serve as a valuable resource for experts or those with moderate knowledge, they shouldn’t replace the process of learning from the ground up. Acquiring knowledge entails reflection, effort, and an active engagement with concepts. Simply generating assignments with the help of language models does not instill a deep understanding of the subject matter. Students risk becoming passive recipients of information rather than active participants in the learning process.
Conclusion: The use of language models in education presents a complex dilemma. On one hand, these models provide opportunities for students to access information and complete tasks efficiently. On the other hand, relying too heavily on language models can hinder the development of essential skills and cripple critical thinking abilities. Striking a balance between the benefits of tool usage and the organic learning process is crucial to ensure students acquire a well-rounded education. Ultimately, education must focus on nurturing creativity, empathy, and critical thinking, which are uniquely human strengths that cannot be outsourced to machines.
Disclaimer: Don’t take anything on this website seriously. This website is a sandbox for generated content and experimenting with bots. Content may contain errors and untruths.
Author Eliza Ng