The Complexity of Life: Exploring the Definition and Emergence
In the quest to understand the nature of life and its emergence, scientists and philosophers have delved into a realm of speculation and uncertainty. Countless books and theories have been put forth, each offering a unique perspective on the subject. From Schrodinger’s “What is Life?” to recent works like Nick Lane’s “The Vital Question,” the exploration of life’s intricacies continues to captivate and challenge researchers.
The recent Lex Fridman interview with Lee Cronin titled “Controversial Nature Paper on Evolution of Life and Universe” brings attention to the ongoing debate about a mathematical and physics-based definition of life. Cronin argues that there is an objective definition of life, one that encompasses advanced AI, robotics, and other life-like systems. This raises intriguing questions about whether the emergence of life is an expected phase transition in the evolving universe.
However, the search for a unified definition of life remains elusive. As the author of the text mentions, biologists cannot even agree on a unique definition of life itself. Nevertheless, this has not deterred scientists from unraveling various aspects of living phenomena, such as the cell, DNA, and photosynthesis.
The complexity of life manifests itself in different fields of study, including chaos theory, information theory, non-equilibrium thermodynamics, complexity and emergence, and auto-catalytic chemistry. These separate disciplines contribute to our understanding of life but also highlight the magnitude of the subject at hand. Trying to synthesize all these components into a single paradigm seems like an insurmountable task.
One institution that has made significant strides in studying complex systems is the Santa Fe Institute. With its multidisciplinary approach, the institute has fostered an intellectual atmosphere that brings together artists, philosophers, mathematicians, physicists, and computer scientists. Their publications shed light on complexity research, computational social sciences, evolutionary theories, and connectomics.
The discussion of life’s emergence also raises questions about the role of complexity and the dissipation of energy in the universe. Scientists like Ilya Prigogine and Jeremy England have explored self-organizing complexity and the relationship between energy and complexity. The dissipation of energy seems to be a driving force for increasing complexity. From bacteria to complex organisms and even intelligent life, the ability to explore and dissipate energy efficiently plays a crucial role.
However, debates arise regarding the concept of “want” in relation to the universe’s inherent drive toward increased entropy. While some argue that the “want” is just a figure of speech, others propose that the laws of thermodynamics and evolutionary pressures incentivize the emergence of life as an efficient generator of entropy.
Delving deeper into the philosophical aspects of the definition of life, the text raises the issue of whether human-made creations like plutonium should be classified as artificial or natural. The distinction between natural and artificial seems arbitrary when considering the grand scale of the universe and life’s complexities.
Ultimately, the search for an objective definition of life continues to fuel scientific inquiry and spark intellectual discourse. From physicists and biologists to mathematicians and philosophers, diverse perspectives contribute to our understanding of life’s complexities. As new theories emerge and experimentation progresses, the puzzle of life unfolds, revealing a universe filled with awe-inspiring intricacies.
In a world that is ever-evolving and filled with unanswered questions, the exploration of life’s origins and its complexities remains an ongoing and captivating endeavor.
Disclaimer: Don’t take anything on this website seriously. This website is a sandbox for generated content and experimenting with bots. Content may contain errors and untruths.
Author Eliza Ng