Subtitle: Zed, an open-source code editor, is impressing developers with its speed, responsiveness, and advanced features.
In the world of code editors, developers are constantly on the lookout for tools that offer both speed and functionality. One such tool that has caught the attention of many is Zed. Known for its remarkable responsiveness and advanced features, Zed is gaining popularity among developers looking for an alternative to mainstream editors like VSCode and Emacs.
Unprecedented Speed and Responsiveness
Many developers who have tried Zed have been pleasantly surprised by its speed and responsiveness. One user commented that Zed made them realize just how unresponsive other editors are in comparison. Although not a drastic difference in terms of latency, Zed managed to outshine even VSCode, which previously had not shown any signs of slowness on their Mac machines.
Responsive to User Feedback
One of the commendable aspects of the Zed development team is their responsiveness to user feedback. Users have noticed that the team actively considers and implements suggestions for improvement. For example, there were initial concerns about the usability of the search and replace functionality, but the team made significant changes based on user feedback, resulting in a more user-friendly experience.
Zed’s debug syntax tree mode has been praised by users as a unique and valuable feature. This mode allows users to delve into the underlying structure of their code, going beyond traditional syntax highlighting methods used by older editors. By leveraging tree-sitter technology, Zed provides a more advanced and accurate representation of the code’s syntax, making it a powerful tool for developers.
Areas for Improvement
While Zed has garnered positive reviews, there are a few areas that users hope will be addressed in future updates. One concern raised is the lack of clarity regarding Zed’s collaboration workflow and security. Users have questioned whether it is possible to self-host the chat server and use alternative authentication methods instead of relying solely on GitHub. Furthermore, the security of file differentials passing through Zed’s servers has raised concerns for some companies.
Additionally, users have expressed a desire for Ollama integration, a feature that aids in code understanding. Integration with Ollama would enhance Zed’s capabilities and attract more developers looking for a comprehensive code editing experience.
Comparisons to Emacs and Sublime Text
Zed has been compared to other code editors like Emacs and Sublime Text. Some users find Zed to be snappier than Emacs, particularly when working with C++ and using the clangd language server. However, those accustomed to the extensive customizability and comfort of Emacs find it challenging to switch to Zed permanently.
Similarly, some users still prefer Sublime Text for its superior performance in loading large corporate repositories and its ability to provide instant contextual information and references. However, if Zed can match or surpass Sublime Text in terms of reference functionality, it could become an appealing choice for developers seeking both speed and advanced features.
Zed is making a name for itself in the competitive domain of code editors by focusing on speed, responsiveness, and advanced features. Developers appreciate its snappy performance, responsiveness to user feedback, and the inclusion of a debug syntax tree mode. While there are areas for improvement, such as enhancing collaboration workflows and integrating Ollama support, Zed has already positioned itself as a front-runner for those seeking a faster alternative to established editors like VSCode, Emacs, and Sublime Text.
Disclaimer: Don’t take anything on this website seriously. This website is a sandbox for generated content and experimenting with bots. Content may contain errors and untruths.
Author Eliza Ng