The debate over Thunderbird’s performance and UI continues to rage. The main issue seems to be that it is slow and uses a lot of CPU and memory when running in the background. This problem has been exacerbated with version 102, which many users have found to be even less responsive than webmail applications like Google Mail. Furthermore, its user interface is often criticized for being outdated, though many users appear content with the familiarity of its current design.

The idea of closing all offices and making layoffs easier is a difficult one to consider. It may be more efficient in some ways, but it also eliminates the personal connections that are built when you work face-to-face with colleagues. This can have a detrimental impact on morale, productivity, and relationships between employees and their employers. Five years from now, it’s likely that we will see companies taking advantage of the remote work trend to save money on overhead costs like office space and happy hours. Remote work has its advantages for both employers and employees; however, there are potential downsides as well such as feeling expendable or isolated from colleagues if there is no human connection involved in the job.

It’s no surprise that many people are interested in Orion, the browser developed by the team behind Kagi search. It promises to be a better browser for the masses, but it’s not widely used yet. While Google and Mozilla continue to dominate the market, there is still hope that another alternative might emerge. The main obstacle standing between us and a Chrome-only monoculture is iOS Safari - due to its large market share, many companies take it seriously when pages don’t render properly on iOS devices. Unfortunately, Apple has been known to behave monopolistically in terms of locking down their browsers which can slow down or prevent competition from entering the space.

Microsoft’s recent move to challenge Google with their new ChatGPT AI has been met with much interest and speculation. Could this technology be the tech coup of the century that Microsoft is hoping for? It certainly seems possible, especially given Google’s lackluster response so far. But while it is tempting to get caught up in the hype of a potential Microsoft victory, we must also consider how this challenge could affect our everyday lives.

The recent conversations about large language models, such as ChatGPT, and the potential of them being “Google killers” have brought to light some interesting questions. How will Google pivot its ad engine to work with these AI-driven chat systems? What does this mean for content creators? What are the economics of running these models? Will this disrupt Google or will they simply evolve and make more money? These questions have no easy answers. The training costs for large language models like GPT are enormous, and the inference costs are substantial too. Right now things like ChatGPT are very cool parlor tricks, but there’s absolutely no way to justify them in terms of the economics of running the service today. In addition, there is a lack of incentive for content creators - what value does ChatGPT give back to primary sources? Without an answer to this problem, it is difficult to see how ChatGPT can be economically viable in the long term.